Here Are The Powerful Words From Women Who Marched In Mississippi

Marching for women’s rights in major, blue-leaning cities like Washington D.C., New York City and Los Angeles is one thing. Marching in the Deep South of Jackson, Miss. is another thing entirely. 

But that didn’t stop the hundreds of women and men who gathered outside the state’s Capitol in Jackson on Saturday to march in solidarity with the millions marching around the world.

Jaribu Hill, the Executive Director at Mississippi Workers’ Center for Human Rights, led the march and gave a speech about the importance of fighting for equal rights with movements like Black Lives Matter during the Trump presidency. A video of her powerful words was posted on YouTube by Theca Jones

“We’ve been here before,” Hill told the cheering crowd on Saturday. “We’ve lived through others who tried to crush us, and kill us, and we’re still standing, Trump.” 

State Representative Alyce Clark reportedly attended the march, as did other public figures like Miss Black Mississippi winner Kristy Johnson, who brought up the persisting issues of the school-to-prison pipeline, equal pay, and reproductive rights ― especially as those issues pertain to black women. 

Hill acknowledged that fighting for justice in a place like Mississippi ― where black men and women face a huge likelihood of being incarcerated and where there is only one remaining abortion clinic due to tremendous reproductive rights stigma ― might seem futile. But she and those who rallied with her show no signs of slowing down.

“We know that we’re in Mississippi and we’re marginalized a lot,” Hill said. “But as you can see from the crowd today, we’re turning the corner on that isolation and that marginalization.”

For more on the Jackson march, watch the video above.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Viola Davis Makes History As First Black Actress To Earn 3 Oscar Nods

Tuesday is a memorable day for Viola Davis, whose remarkable performance in the film “Fences” has earned her an Oscar nomination. 

It is also a historic one: Davis is now the first and only black actress to have received three Oscar nominations. Davis has previously twice been nominated for Best Supporting Actress, in the 2009 film “Doubt” and the 2012 film “The Help.”

Davis’s stunning performance in “Fences,” which was adapted from a play by director August Wilson, has received widespread praise. She even took home the Golden Globe for her role in the film earlier this month, where she delivered a stirring and unforgettable speech (although, that seems to happen almost every time she speaks.)

Before Tuesday’s nomination, Davis and actress Whoopi Goldberg were tied for the most nominations earned by a black actress. Goldberg was nominated in 1986 for “The Color Purple” and again in 1991 when she took home the win for “Ghost.” 

Now, Davis, who recently received a star on The Hollywood Walk Of Fame, officially stands in her own lane. We congratulate her on all her success! 

 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Barry Jenkins Quietly Makes History With Oscar Nomination Trifecta

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Barry Jenkins, the writer and director behind “Moonlight,” could become the biggest story of awards season should he nab Best Director at the 89th Academy Awards next month. His win would mark the first time a black man had ever done so.

But when the nominations were announced on Tuesday, Jenkins quietly made a little history along the way as well, becoming the first black writer-director to get nominated for not only Best Picture and Best Director but Best Screenplay, too.

All in all, “Moonlight” nabbed eight nominations, tying “Arrival” for second most among all films after “La La Land.”

No black man has ever won Best Director at the Oscars, and Jenkins is just the fourth to ever get nominated.

John Singleton famously did it first in 1992 with “Boyz n the Hood,” while also scoring a nomination for a best screenplay award. Then Lee Daniels was nominated in 2010 with “Precious,” the film for which Geoffrey Fletcher won Best Adapted Screenplay. Most recently, Steve McQueen was nominated for Best Director in 2014 for “12 Years a Slave,” for which John Ridley won Best Adapted Screenplay.

But Jenkins is alone in being nominated for Best Picture while also receiving individual nominations for his directing and for Best Adapted Screenplay. (”Moonlight” is based on the play “In Moonlight Black Boys Look Blue.”) Notably, no black woman has ever been nominated for Best Director. 

“Moonlight,” which has grossed more than $15 million worldwide, follows the life of a boy named Chiron, who grows up in impoverished 1980s Miami with a drug-addicted mother while struggling to come to terms with his own sexuality. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Oscar Nominations Snub Amy Adams, 'Jackie,' Tom Hanks And More

After months of anticipation, the nominees for the 89th annual Academy Awards were announced on Tuesday morning. While front-runners like “La La Land,” “Moonlight” and “Manchester by the Sea” nabbed spots in major categories, other films and their respective talent didn’t fare as well. 

Here are the snubs and surprises of the 2017 Oscar race. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Paris Jackson Still Believes That Someone Murdered Her Father Michael

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Paris Jackson still has questions about her father Michael Jackson’s death. 

The 18-year-old daughter of the pop legend covers Rolling Stone’s February issue and reveals in her first in-depth interview about her life under Michael’s care that she believes someone else had a hand in his demise. 

Jackson died from cardiac arrest caused by a lethal combination of prescription drugs in June 2009, when Paris was just 11 years old. His personal physician, Conrad Murray, who treated the singer with propofol, a powerful surgical anesthetic drug, shortly before his death, was later charged with involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to four years in prison in 2011. 

Paris, who prefers to use air quotes when referring to Murray as a “doctor,” blames him for her father’s death, but still has suspicions that something more sinister was at play. Her father, Paris says, would often express fears that an unspecified someone would kill him one day and that’s why she is still convinced that he was “murdered.” 

“Because it’s obvious,” Paris explained in the article. “All arrows point to that. It sounds like a total conspiracy theory and it sounds like bullshit, but all real fans and everybody in the family knows it. It was a setup. It was bullshit.”

The 18-year-old refuses to specify who the culprit could be in the interview because, as she puts it, “a lot of people” wanted Jackson dead. However, Paris admits that she still wants revenge, but is waiting for the right time to strike.  

“I definitely do, but it’s a chess game,” she adds. “And I am trying to play the chess game the right way. And that’s all I can say about that right now.”

Despite the questions that remain about Jackson’s final days, there’s one thing Paris is sure of: her father’s love. To an outsider, she knows that her family life might appear to be strange, but at Neverland Ranch, Jackson’s fantastical compound in Santa Barbara, in her eyes, everything was normal.

“Nobody experienced him being a father to them. And if they did, the entire perception of him would be completely and forever changed,” she said. “He did not bullshit us … You try to give kids the best childhood possible. But you also have to prepare them for the shitty world.”

To read the full interview, head over to Rolling Stone

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Here Are The 2017 Oscar Nominations

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

On Tuesday, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced the nominees for the 89th Annual Academy Awards. 

The Oscars are the final and biggest award show of the season, culminating in a massive display of all the glitz and glamour we’ve come to associate with Hollywood. 

After cleaning up at the Golden Globes in January with seven awards, “La La Land” is in the lead with 14 nominations ― tying the record previously set by “All About Eve” in 1950 and “Titanic” in 1997.  Meanwhile, “Arrival” and “Moonlight” earned eight nominations each, followed by “Manchester by the Sea,” “Lion” and “Hacksaw Ridge,” each earning six nominations.

Check out the full list of nominees below:

Best Picture

“Arrival”
”Fences”
”Hacksaw Ridge”
”Hell or High Water”
”Hidden Figures”
”La La Land”
”Lion”
”Manchester by the Sea”
”Moonlight”

Best Director

Denis Villeneuve, “Arrival”
Mel Gibson, “Hacksaw Ridge”
Damien Chazelle, “La La Land”
Kenneth Lonergan, “Manchester by the Sea”
Barry Jenkins, “Moonlight”

Best Actress

Emma Stone, “La La Land”
Natalie Portman, “Jackie”
Ruth Negga, “Loving”
Meryl Streep, “Florence Foster Jenkins”
Isabelle Huppert, “Elle”

Best Actor

Casey Affleck, “Manchester by the Sea”
Andrew Garfield, “Hacksaw Ridge”
Ryan Gosling, La La Land”
Viggo Mortensen, Captain Fantastic”
Denzel Washington, “Fences”

Best Supporting Actress

Viola Davis, “Fences”
Naomie Harris, “Moonlight”
Nicole Kidman, “Lion” 
Octavia Spencer, “Hidden Figures” 
Michelle Williams, “Manchester by the Sea”

Best Supporting Actor

Mahershala Ali, “Moonlight”
Jeff Bridges,”Hell or High Water”
Lucas Hedges, “Manchester by the Sea”
Dev Patel, “Lion”
Michael Shannon, “Nocturnal Animals”

Best Adapted Screenplay

“Arrival”
”Fences”
”Hidden Figures”
”Lion”
”Moonlight”

Best Original Screenplay

“Hell or High Water”
”La La Land”
”The Lobster”
”Manchester by the Sea”
”20th Century Women”

Best Foreign Language Film

“Land of Mine,” Martin Zandvliet, Denmark
”A Man Called Ove,” Hannes Holm,  Sweden
”The Salesman,”  Asghar Farhadi, Iran
”Tanna,” Bentley Dean, Martin Butler, Australia,
”Toni Erdmann,” Maren Ade, Germany 

Best Documentary Feature

“Fire at Sea”
“I Am Not Your Negro”
“Life, Animated”
”13th”
“O.J.: Made in America”

Best Animated Feature

“Kubo and the Two Strings”
”Moana”
”My Life as a Zucchini”
”The Red Turtle”
”Zootopia” 

Best Film Editing

“Arrival”
”Hacksaw Ridge”
”Hell or High Water”
”La La Land”
”Moonlight”

Best Original Song

 “Audition (The Fools Who Dream),” “La La Land”
“Can’t Stop the Feeling,” “Trolls”
“City of Stars,” “La La Land”
“The Empty Chair,” “Jim: The James Foley Story”
“How Far I’ll Go,” “Moana”

Best Original Score

“Jackie”
”La La Land”
”Lion”
”Moonlight”
”Passengers” 

Best Cinematography

“Arrival,” Bradford Young
”La La Land,” Linus Sandgren
”Silence,” Rodrigo Prieto
”Lion,” Grieg Fraser
”Moonlight,” James Laxton

Best Costume Design

“Allied”
”Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them”
”Florence Foster Jenkins”
”Jackie”
”La La Land”   

Best Makeup and Hairstyling

“A Man Called Ove”
”Star Trek Beyond”
”Suicide Squad”

Best Production Design

“Arrival”
”Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them”
”Hail, Caesar!”
”La La Land”
”Passengers

Best Sound Editing

“Arrival”
”Deepwater Horizon”
”Hacksaw Ridge”
”La La Land”
”Sully” 

Best Sound Mixing

 “Arrival”
”Hacksaw Ridge”
”La La Land”
”Rogue One”
”13  Hours”

Best Visual Effects

“Rogue One”
”The Jungle Book”
”Doctor Strange”
”Fantastic Beats and Where to Find Them”
”Arrival”
”The BFG”
”Kubo and the Two Strings”
”A Monster Calls”

Best Short Film, Live Action

“Ennemis Intérieurs”
”La Femme et le TGV”
”Silent Nights”
”Sing”
”Timecode”

Best Short Film, Animated

“Blind Vaysha”
”Borrowed Time”
”Pear Cider and Cigarettes”
”Pearl”
”Piper”

Best Documentary, Short Subject

“Extremis”
”4.1 Miles”
”Joe’s Violin”
”Watani: My Homeland”
”The White Helmets”  

The 89th Academy Awards, hosted by Jimmy Kimmel, will air live on ABC at 8:30 p.m. ET on Feb. 26.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Cards Against Humanity Seeks CEO With Very Specific Skill Set

Cards Against Humanity wants to hire a CEO.

But unless you happen to be former President Barack Obama, it’s probably not worth even applying for the position.

The Chicago-based politically incorrect party game’s creators posted this very specific job listing on Craigslist on Monday, detailing what they expect from potential candidates:

While many applicants may have “strong public speaking skills” and be an “excellent negotiator able to deal with stubborn opposition,” the requirement of being the first black editor of the Harvard Law Review and having a minimum of eight years’ experience as president of the United States or an equivalent nation kind of narrows the field down to one.

But why limit its options in attracting a new boss? Cards Against Humanity explains in the listing:

Let’s face it: we have no idea what we’re doing. This year, we wasted an enormous amount of time and energy trying to get Hillary Clinton elected President, and on Black Friday we dug a huge hole in the ground because we wanted to find out if it would be funny.

It’s been a great run, but now it’s time for real adult leadership.

So, the company essentially believes Obama can help take it to the next level.

While he most likely won’t apply for the full-time role, the appeal of returning to Chicago, receiving 51 percent of the company and setting his own salary may prove too attractive to resist. 

Or he may just end up joining music streaming service Spotify, which offered him the position of “President of Playlists” earlier this month.

Expect more job offers like these in the coming weeks and months.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage + articlesList=583bcee9e4b000af95eeb28d,573cc247e4b0aee7b8e8cad8,56781c26e4b06fa6887ddeed

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Here's What We Did On Inauguration Day

Instead of watching President Donald Trump be sworn in on Friday, HuffPost Women and Bustle, in partnership with Bold, put together a non-partisan Inauguration Day event in D.C. Watch Us Run was a day of action, laughter, planning ― and a few silly photos. 

The event was filled with great discussions about resilience, solidarity and sisterhood. Speakers included humanitarian and actor Ashley Judd, Academy Award-winning filmmaker Michael Moore, comedian and author Phoebe Robinson, actor and author Amber Tamblyn, Mother of the Movement Lucy McBath and more. 

Throughout the day, panelists discussed how to grassroots organize, how to run for political office and the responsibility artists and the media have in the time of Trump. 

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=587fdb35e4b04b69667e2795,5880e494e4b0e3a735676beb

One highlight of the day came during Moore’s keynote speech when the filmmaker laid out his blueprint for resisting what he sees as the negative policy implications of the Trump presidency. 

“I want every one of us to commit ― starting today if you can, but certainly starting on Monday ― that you make a part of your daily routine to call Congress,” Moore urged

“Individually you all have to take a stand… We are now in the Trump era,” he said. “You’re going to have to put some serious thought into putting yourself on the line.”  

Another highlight came during Judd’s one-on-one chat with Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-Calif.). Judd ―  a three-time rape survivor ― gave voice to thousands of women across the country who have been impacted by Trump’s rise by sharing her personal story of being re-triggered by Trump’s election. 

“It’s not OK,” Judd said. “For me, it’s not about the wall, it’s not about any of that stuff. It’s about, you voted for a pussy grabber. You voted for someone who calls his wife a piece of ass, whose daughter is his favorite sex symbol. It really boils down, to me, to the sexual assault and misogyny piece.”

Scroll below to see more of what we were up to on Inauguration Day. Then join us in action.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=58824df5e4b0e3a73568a7fd,587e8c99e4b0cf0ae88094df,588260c0e4b096b4a2318473

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Why I Had Mixed Emotions About The Women's March

Millions turned out on Saturday for the Women’s March on Washington and its sister marches around the world. I wasn’t one of them.

It isn’t that I was against the core ideals of the march, or sided with those who thought it was just a bunch of feminist nonsense. I very much recognized the need for the united front against a new administration whose policies stand to infringe upon the rights of women, people of color, immigrants, the disabled and members of the LGBTQ community. And yet, I still had deeply complex feelings about how I, as a black immigrant woman, fit into the equation.

This was the most important sign at the #womensmarch. We have work to do. (via @eboneedavis)

A photo posted by Cameron Russell (@cameronrussell) on Jan 22, 2017 at 5:58am PST

Black women tried to save us. Ninety-four percent of black women voted against Trump. They showed up at the polls and then, after 53 percent of white women voted us into the situation we’re in today, black woman showed up again, in droves and in solidarity. Putting aside the fact that not all of us worshipped Hillary Clinton, or resonated with phrases like “nasty woman” and “pussy grabs back,” black women showed up again

From an office in NYC, I watched via live-stream as Janet Mock spoke out about the need for taking real action, and Janelle Monae created space for the Mothers of the Movement to chant their slain son’s names, and Angela Davis reminded us that “history cannot be deleted like web pages,” and I felt inspired.

I felt equally inspired to see white, Latino, Asian, indigenous, Muslim, undocumented, sexual assault survivors, queer, trans and disabled people take the stage to speak out about the importance of intersectionality and diversity. It may have looked like the very worst of SJW Tumblr to those against the march, but to me it looked beautiful. It looked like America. 

There’s real work to do, but it won’t get done if we don’t, as a collective, support each other in all our struggles, not just the one’s that are trending.

And yet, at the same time, it didn’t feel good to see the numerous signs that centered feminism around having a vagina, harmfully excluding trans and nonconforming protestors. It didn’t feel good to know that just days before the march, Janet Mock had to call out the organizers for removing a line she’d contributed to the march manifesto about the need for recognizing the rights of sex workers. It didn’t feel good to see Madonna, a woman who never really apologized for publicly using the n-word, stand on the same stage as my heroes, joking cavalierly about blowing up the White House in a way that few women of color would ever dare to do. 

Days before the protest, writer and activist Jamilah Lemieux announced that she’d be skipping the march for reasons that resonated with me on a deep level. For Color Lines, she wrote about being tired of black and brown women having to routinely put their own politics aside in the name of unity.

“I’d like to see a million White women march to the grave of Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth or Audre Lorde,” Lemieux wrote

Even though Lemieux opted out of the march, there were many black women present who participated while also bravely calling out the same issues she wrote about. In one iconic photo that quickly went viral on social media, a black women held up a sign reading “Don’t forget: White women voted for TRUMP.”

Some people aren’t happy about the way women of color are expressing our mixed, sometimes negative feelings about this latest surge in feminist organizing. Ahead of the march, amidst controversy about dueling ideologies amongst organizers, writer Emma-Kate Symons complained about how the feminism she grew up with was being “reduced to a grab bag of competing victimhood narratives and individualist identities jostling for most oppressed status.” 

“Can’t we rise above the sniping about ‘privilege,’ ‘white feminism,’ ‘intersectionality,’ and hierarchies of grievance in the face of Trump and the dangers he poses to the American and international liberal world order and women everywhere?” Symons wrote for Women in the World.

Black women are entitled to our anger and frustration. We’re entitled to call out white women even as we join them in protest. Change and revolution were never supposed to be easy, convenient, or comfortable.

It’s exactly reactions like that one that made me, and so many other black and brown women, feel torn about the Women’s March. 

This isn’t the Oppression Olympics, but black women are entitled to our anger and frustration. We’re entitled to call out white women even as we join them in protest. Change and revolution were never supposed to be easy, convenient, or comfortable. 

At the Washington march on Saturday, Gloria Steinem said, “If Trump creates a Muslim registry, we will all register as Muslims.”

That’s a beautiful sentiment, but it’s one that needs actual follow-through. If we’re not careful, the concept of “intersectionality” will go the way of “diversity,” becoming an empty and overused phrase by people who think saying it or talking about it is tantamount to actually integrating it into their lives. The march was an encouraging beginning, perhaps even a cathartic one. But there’s real work to do, but it won’t get done if we don’t, as a collective, support each other in all our struggles, not just the one’s that are trending.  

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Before You Celebrate The Zero Arrests At The Women’s March…

“No Arrests Made At Peaceful Women’s March In Washington.”

This, from People.com, was just one of dozens of headlines that sprang up in the wake of Saturday’s march, a demonstration that may have been the largest in American history, with marches held in at least 500 cities across the nation.

The fact that the protests in Washington, D.C. and around the country went off without incident has been touted as a cause for celebration. In stark contrast to the Inauguration Day protests that resulted in damaged property and over 200 arrests, the Women’s March was a shining beacon of the “right” way to voice dissent. 

Of course, it is always a good thing when citizens are allowed to exercise their right to protest without anyone being harmed or detained. But there’s a question that should be asked and acknowledged, even as we celebrate the success of the protest:

Would the outcome have been the same if the march had been exclusively organized by and mostly comprised of women of color? 

Let’s be real. A large group of mostly white women wearing knit pink hats is simply not going to be policed in same way a large group of people of color would be. This is not to say that there isn’t long history, stemming all the way to the suffragette movement, of white women being harassed and detained by police for standing up for what’s right. But in today’s context, large, peaceful groups of white women are simply not seen as threats to the same extent as non-white women.

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

White women who participated in the march can be proud of many things, but congratulating themselves for being peaceful and non-violent is a slap in the face to their fellow POC protestors. There isn’t a “right” way to protest. Indeed, peaceful and non-violent protest has, historically, never necessarily protected people of color from arrest. 

From the Civil Rights movement of the ‘60s, to the Black Lives Matter movement (started by three black women) and the protests at Standing Rock, peaceful protests organized, led and attended by women and people of color have been met with hostility and militarization by the police.  Meaning, police have arrived to these protests already in riot gear, already with their tasers and tear gas poised. There’s an implicit assumption that any gathering of brown or black folk equals trouble. 

It’s a double standard we’ve seen too many times.

Many of us remember the now iconic photo of Ieshia Evans, a Black Lives Matter protestor in Baton Rouge, peacefully confronting police officers clad in militarized riot gear, their body language tense and on high alert as Evans, wearing a patterned sundress, stands calmly before them. It was a flower-in-the-gun-barrel moment, a photo that so vividly illustrated the way black bodies and black lives are seen as inherent threats. 

But people are perhaps less familiar with the photo snapped just seconds after the one above by photographer Jonathan Bachman. It’s an image that captures the true reality of being a black protestor today, as Davis is shuffled forward by two Baton Rouge officers, with a long, impressive line of other riot-gear officers looking on. 

Was Davis’s behavior any less peaceful than the crowds in D.C. on Saturday?

This isn’t about planting seeds of division, or pointing figures. No one is asking white women to feel bad about themselves, or ignore the very real oppression and threats to their rights that prompted so many to make their voices heard.

But a theme of the Women’s March was the importance of inclusion and intersectionality, and being accountable to and responsible for one another. In the spirit of that theme, there’s nothing wrong with acknowledging that the presence of white women at the march served as a kind of buffer to police. 

Black and brown women came out in solidarity despite the complex politics of the march, despite the 53 percent of white women who voted for Trump, and despite the threat of possible arrest or unpleasant encounters with police. That’s sisterhood. It’s a relationship built on respect and trust. Hopefully, in the interest of continuing that relationship, white women will use their privilege in the future to protect those who march against issues that affect POC communities specifically. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices