Samuel L. Jackson On Ben Carson's Slavery Comment: 'Mothaf***a Please'

Ben Carson gave a speech on Monday that raised a lot of eyebrows, including Samuel L. Jackson’s.

In his debut as secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Carson told agency employees about the virtues of the “can-do” American society and used “immigrants” who “came here in the bottom of slave ships” as the examples of that virtue.

“That’s what America is about,” Carson said. “A land of dreams and opportunity. There were other immigrants who came here in the bottom of slave ships, worked even longer, even harder for less. But they too had a dream that one day their sons, daughters, grandsons, granddaughters, great grandsons, great granddaughters might pursue prosperity and happiness in this land.”

Naturally, Twitter was up in arms about Carson’s comments. This is what actor Samuel L. Jackson had to say about it:

And the NAACP…

And Charlamagne Tha God…

And a few others:

Ben Carson, sit down. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Laurie Hernandez Wants To Be The Latina Role Model She Never Had

Laurie Hernandez knows that her accomplishments could inspire young Latinas hoping for Olympic greatness. 

The 16-year-old gymnast, gold medalist, best-selling author and “Dancing With The Stars” winner is one the many subjects of MTV and the Association of National Advertisers’ #SeeHer campaign.

In her video for the campaign, Hernandez noted she didn’t have U.S. Latina gymnasts at the Olympics to look up to when she was growing up. 

“I feel like it’s a big responsibility to represent my heritage and the United States at the Olympics, growing up I didn’t see too many Hispanics and I was really excited to be a role model for not just my generation but generations ahead,” Hernandez says in the video. “It means the world to me to be the second [U.S.-born] Latina to be a part of the women’s gymnastics team.”

The boricua gymnast talked about having “Latinas kind of rise in the Olympics” in an August 2016 interview with the Huffington Post. 

“Growing up, I feel there [weren’t] too many Hispanics and Latinas to look up to. I didn’t recognize anyone too much when I was younger and say ‘this person inspired me like crazy,’” she told HuffPost. “I feel that now that I’m able to win a gold medal at the Olympics, win a silver medal, I feel little girls will be able to look up to me, and Hispanics will kind of rise a little more.”

The #SeeHer initiative, which is highlighting women’s accomplishments in one-minute videos in honor of Women’s History Month, will also spotlight Rihanna, Gina Rodriguez, fashion designer Lucy Jones, author Amani Al-Khatahtbeh, and and student Keiana Cave. 

Watch Hernandez’s vide above. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Janelle Monáe Explains Why Periods Should Be A Point Of Pride In 3 Tweets

Janelle Monáe is here for period pride. 

On March 3, the “Hidden Figures” actress tweeted about why women’s periods are nothing to be ashamed of. “Menstrual Period Blood,” Monáe began her Twitter conversation, adding five minutes later: “It’s sad that there are prob [sic] folks more grossed out by and/or ashamed of menstrual period blood than they are the current administration.”

Scroll below to read Monáe’s awesome thoughts on periods and period-shamers. 

About ten minutes later, Monáe began retweeting people who disagreed with her and responded to their points. One Twitter user tweeted at Monáe, writing: “Menstrual blood is gross.” 

The actress responded to the Twitter user, explaining why menstrual blood is something to “celebrate.” Monáe also broke down exactly why calling menstrual blood “gross” or “disgusting” is so problematic. 

“When a person uses language like… ‘Gross’ this causes the person on the receiving end to feel ashamed, embarrassed, humiliated, etc,” Monáe wrote. Scroll below to read her full thoughts. 

Monáe’s in-depth Twitter conversation sparked other users to tweet their support and thank the actress for speaking out about the issue.   

Monáe for President? 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Tracee Ellis Ross Praises 17-Year-Old Yara Shahidi In Heartfelt Letter

The love that Tracee Ellis Ross shares with her TV daughter and “Black-ish” co-star Yara Shahidi is endearing.

Which is why Ross was the perfect person to introduce the 17-year-old recipient of the “Generation Next” award at the 10th Annual Essence Black Women in Hollywood Awards in Beverly Hills on Feb. 23, which aired Sunday on OWN. The Golden Globe-winning actress read a letter that emphasized how special their bond has become.

“Our relationship is important and is not just about me playing your mom on screen,” Ross told Shahidi onstage. “It is about what happens between takes, in the hair and makeup trailer, in our calls and text exchanges and when we see each other out in life as two brown girls with lots of hair that is either masterfully braided, bunned, or just flying free.”

Ross praised the young black and Iranian American actress not only for her tremendous growth, but also for using her platform to speak out about racial injustice and gender parity. Ross lauded Shahidi for finding her own voice and becoming comfortable in her own skin as a “strong, joyous and smart” black girl.

Ross stressed the importance of Shahidi’s presence on and off-screen for young girls. Ross ended her speech with some encouraging words for her TV daughter:

Young Yara …

May you find acceptance, safety, joy and beauty in your own body.

May you stay curious and teachable.

As an artist, and as a girl with a platform, the invitation is set before you to continue to speak truth and to use your creative expression to deepen our understanding of humanity and further social progress. I know you will do so brilliantly.

Love,
Tracee

Read Ross’ full letter to Shahidi here

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Beyoncé And Blue Look Straight Out Of A Fairy Tale At 'Beauty And The Beast' Premiere

Mama-daughter night out. 

Beyoncé and Blue Ivy had an adorable evening out together for the premiere of “Beauty and the Beast” at the El Capitan Theatre in Hollywood Thursday night. The two entered the venue with Jay Z at the last minute, according to The Hollywood Reporter, and joined the cast of the live-action film for the debut. 

The singer shared photos on her website Monday, showing her dressed in an emerald green chiffon gown and Blue in a matching hue. 

It really doesn’t get any cuter. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Trump Forced To Water Down Executive Order On Immigration

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

The Trump administration ignited protests at airports around the country with an executive order on Jan. 27 that blocked travel to the U.S. by permanent residents and visa holders from seven Muslim-majority countries.

After federal judges struck down the ban, the administration went back to the drawing board. A new order signed Monday with little fanfare ― no cameras were even present ― is a backdown of monumental proportions: The only travelers banned are those without visas from six nations ― Iraq was scratched from the list. And with or without this order, those without visas were already barred from traveling to the U.S.

The new order represents a major political defeat for the Trump administration, which decided to shove aside the dozens of lawsuits that were filed after the first order was signed and just sign a new order. Top Trump officials significantly watered down their language this time around. Gone were the overt mentions of “extreme vetting” and rooting out “radical Islamic terrorism.”

“The U.S. has a right to control who enters our country and to keep out those who will do us harm,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Monday. He did note that more than 300 people who came into the country as refugees are under investigation for potential terror-related charges.

Yet, some of the first order’s core tenets are still in place. The travel ban on non-visa holders from the six targeted countries ― Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen ― is still in effect for 90 days. And the refugee resettlement program will still be disbanded for 120 days, even though there’s no singling out of Syrian refugees. And the total number of refugees who can enter the U.S. this fiscal year will still go down from 110,000 to 50,000.

What changed in the new order:

  • Iraq removed from list of countries on the travel ban

  • Applies only to non-visa holders (anyone with a valid or multi-entry visa is exempt from the new order)

  • Will not go into effect until March 16 to avoid chaos

  • Exceptions for religious minorities removed

What remains from the previous order:

  • Refugee resettlement program banned for 120 days

  • Travel ban for citizens of some countries in effect for 90 days

  • Cap on refugee resettlement for fiscal year 2017 plummets from 110,000 to 50,000

Here’s a breakdown of the changes:

Blanket ban on Iraqis removed

Iraqi citizens will no longer all be barred from entering the country in the revised order. Iraq has agreed to “increased cooperation with the U.S. about information sharing” and screening since the first order’s signing, a senior administration official said Monday.

But that doesn’t mean that any and all people from Iraq can all of a sudden make it into the U.S. Refugees from Iraq still won’t be eligible for immediate resettlement since the refugee program overall is on hold for at least 120 days. The travel ban on the six other countries ― Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen ― remains in place.

Iraqis who work with the U.S. military are eligible for a visa category called the Special Immigrant Visa. Many Iraqis and Afghans entering the U.S. on SIVs after the first order was signed faced detention at airports across the country.

Green card and visa holders are now exempt

The revised order specifies that it will not ban the entry of green card or visa holders from the six targeted countries, many of whom were barred from entering the U.S. the first time around.

“We’re talking about the future entry of individuals into the United States, we’re not talking about lawful permanent residents or folks who are already in the United States,” the administration official said.

President Donald Trump’s own Cabinet had trouble explaining the green card issue in the weeks following the original order. Chief of Staff Reince Priebus first said green card holders wouldn’t be affected by the order, then retracted and admitted they would.

Syrian refugees no longer indefinitely banned

The clause in the original order that indefinitely banned the entry of all Syrian refugees into the U.S. has been removed.

“Syrian refugees are treated the way all refugees are,” presidential counselor Kellyanne Conway told Fox News on Monday.

But the clause halting all refugee resettlement activity for 120 days is still in place, and that includes Syrians. Not to mention that Syrians who are not refugees will also be barred from entry for 90 days because the country is on the list of the six targeted nations.

Streamlined rollout of the order

The new order doesn’t go into effect until March 16 in order to phase in the implementation. This also means that those people already in transit are exempt from the order.

“You should not see any chaos at airports. There are not going to be folks stopped tonight at airports,” the administration official said.

Immigration lawyers across the country sprung into action in late January after hearing reports that people were being unlawfully detained at airports. Due to confusion surrounding who specifically was covered by the ban, officials decided to hold many people for questioning and prevent others from boarding flights altogether.

No more overt discrimination against Muslims

Finally, the new order also removes the section in the original stipulating that some refugee claims could be prioritized “on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual’s country of nationality.”

This was interpreted as an exception being made for Christians, since Trump has highlighted the plight of Christians in Muslim-majority countries numerous times. He also justified the signing of the order in the first place by expressing the need to keep “radical Islamic terrorists” out of the U.S.

What happens next?

The backlash from the first order hit the Trump administration from every angle. Protests erupted around the world just hours after that order went into effect. The Justice Department refused to defend it. And more than 50 lawsuits were filed in the following days.

A federal judge for the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Seattle dealt the harshest blow of them all by blocking the order’s implementation nationwide on Feb. 3. U.S. District Judge James Robart failed to find compelling evidence that immigrants from the seven countries targeted in the order ― Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen ― had committed attacks on U.S. soil.

The administration unsuccessfully appealed that decision; a three-judge panel maintained the block the following week. Trump responded to the backlash by repeatedly referring to the court’s ruling as a “bad decision” and denigrating Robart via Twitter. 

Legal advocacy organizations are now gearing up to file a fresh round of lawsuits in response to the new order.

“As long as there continues to be a ban, we will pursue our lawsuits,” Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, told Politico on Monday. “The discrimination that spurred the ban doesn’t simply disappear by the removal of a few words.”

This story has been updated with further details of the order and administration comments about it.

How will Trump’s first 100 days impact you? Sign up for our weekly newsletter and get breaking updates on Trump’s presidency by messaging us here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Gloria Steinem Had The Perfect Response To Criticism Over Emma Watson's VF Cover

Emma Watson’s revealing outfit on the March cover of Vanity Fair has people criticizing and questioning the actress’ feminist credentials. 

But, of course, Gloria Steinem set the record straight in a succinct and spot-on statement.

In a quick interview with TMZ at LaGuardia airport on March 3, Steinem reminded the world that women can be feminists and express their sexuality. “Can feminists wear sexy outfits?” the TMZ reporter asked Steinem.

Her response? Perfection.

“Feminists can wear anything they fucking want,” the iconic feminist answered, while laughing at just how absurd the question was. She later added that maybe the people criticizing Watson “have an incomplete idea of who [feminists] are.” 

On Sunday, Watson responded to the criticism in an interview with Reuters. 

“It just always reveals to me how many misconceptions and what a misunderstanding there is of what feminism is,” the 26-year-old actress said. “…Feminism is not a stick with which to beat other women with. It’s about freedom, it’s about liberation, it’s about equality. I really don’t know what my tits have to do with it. It’s very confusing.”

Watch the full Reuters interview below. 

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

'Moonlight' Saw Its Best Box-Office Totals Yet Thanks To Best Picture Win

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

In the wake of its Best Picture win at last Sunday’s Oscars, “Moonlight” enjoyed a healthy second wind at the box office this weekend. 

Barry Jenkins’ coming-of-age drama added $2.52 million to its grosses, which now total $25.4 million, an impressive sum for a movie that cost a mere $1.5 million to make.

This was its most lucrative weekend yet. “Moonlight” played in 1,564 theaters, its highest count since first opening on four screens in late October. 

Movies are regularly re-released or expanded to wider theater tallies after scoring Best Picture, but the “Moonlight” revenue tops that of the past four Best Picture champions. Last year’s titleholder, “Spotlight,” collected $1.8 million, according to Box Office Mojo. Before it, “Birdman” made $1.9 million, and “12 Years a Slave” and “Argo” each accrued about $2.1 million. All four saw smaller expansions than “Moonlight.” To find a Best Picture re-release that grossed more than “Moonlight,” we have to go back to 2012 winner “The Artist,” which drew $3.6 million in 1,756 locations.

While some of the “Moonlight” victory has been overshadowed by the envelope snafu that resulted in presenters Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway at first crowning “La La Land,” this win should not be undersold. “Moonlight” climbed almost 260 percent compared to the previous week’s grosses, by far the most of any movie this weekend. That’s especially impressive considering it had already hit VOD platforms. A24, the independent studio behind the film, also reported strong digital sales over the past several days. The movie currently sits at No. 4 on the iTunes chart. 

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=5808ee3ce4b0dd54ce38c1e7,58b458c5e4b0a8a9b784b87f,589ca0c9e4b0c1284f2b1206

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

10 New Books By Women Writers Of Color To Add To Your Must-Read List

Glory Edim just wanted to talk about books with her friends.

At least, that’s how her book club, Well-Read Black Girl, got started. She began posting about new books she looked forward to reading on Instagram, and decided to do an in-person discussion of Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Between the World and Me. That meeting was transformative for Edim and the other women in attendance. “Some people were crying, people just really got into what made the book emotional for them,” she told The Huffington Post in an interview.

It was an intimate gathering of 10 or so avid readers; now, two years later, the group has ballooned to over 40, not counting the growing online community Edim has garnered, or the book lovers who turned out to her recent events at the Brooklyn Museum or The Strand. In the future, Edim wants to open satellite chapters in Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta and anywhere else there’s interest.

But for now, she’s just excited to spotlight authors, both established and forthcoming. Below, she raves about some of her favorites. 

How did your book club come about?

Originally, it was something that I had started with the intent of just making new friends and having it be a small thing I was doing with friends from college. My boyfriend, for my birthday, had made me this shirt that said “well-read black girl” ― I’ve always been a little bit of a bibliophile, books everywhere. So when people would see this shirt, they’d inquire about it and want to know, “Oh, where did you get it?” So I was like, oh, this is a catchy name, this is something I could use for the book club.

I work in marketing, so it was my natural inclination to end up using Instagram to spark conversation. I noticed that other people started following along, asking for suggestions or my book recommendations, so I started to do a newsletter dedicated to this idea of paying tribute to black women writers and to amplify their voices. So that’s how it got started, from a T-shirt to an Instagram to this whole movement two years later. For lack of a better word, it was kind of a selfish idea. I just love books.

So it started online, and then you started meeting in person.

One book that I was reading at the time was The Star Side of Bird Hill by Naomi Jackson. The Ta-Nehisi Coates book was kind of a test run, but then with Naomi’s book, I ended up meeting her […] and asking her to participate. When I made that ask, I didn’t anticipate that she would say yes. And she decided that she would come and talk to us about the book. That was the first Well-Read Black Girl event. She read a passage from the book, and she told us about her creative process, and even what happened when she had the book as a draft. I give so much credit to Naomi, because without her encouragement I probably wouldn’t have gone full-fledged and continued so adamantly about inviting people and building a community. And her friend Natalie Diaz joined her at the discussion, so it was like, two-for-one.

So Naomi was like, you should talk to Angela Flournoy, she has her new book The Turner House coming out. So then that became our next book and we invited her to come speak. So it kind of snowballed, gaining momentum slowly.

It wasn’t this massive group of people. It was very intimate. It felt like you could ask questions that were just in context. Some of the questions weren’t about Naomi’s book, it was like, how did you feel when you were a 13-year-old girl? It became a larger discussion about mental illness, and how you define black girlhood. All these things started to emerge from the book club. It was very affirming to have other women nodding, saying, “Yes, I felt the same way when I read this paragraph.” Clearly you want to talk about the book, but it’s also a great space to be like, “Hey, girl, what’s happening in your world? We support you and help you through whatever you’re going through.”

It sounds like an intimate space. How do you maintain that as the book club grows?

It’s 35 or 40 people ― it’s a lot larger. This year we kicked off a partnership with New Women’s Space, a community center, almost. They host workshops and do panels. It kind of runs the gamut. We changed the schedule so we meet the last Saturday of every month. Our first meeting there was in January, when we did Brit Bennett’s book The Mothers. And we’re reading Zadie Smith’s book Swing Time right now.

When I think about the intimacy, it is harder to maintain when it compares to the 10 women I started with. But those 10 women are still part of the group. They help facilitate the conversation. It’s very democratic, so we rotate who moderates. I’m very into fluid conversation. We break into groups to have conversations one-on-one, then come together to have a group dialogue. We go to the movies together, go to concerts together, do other things outside of the book club. Friendships are forming.

It’s also very intergenerational. I’ve had moments when moms and daughters come, too. Last summer we were reading the book We Love You, Charlie Freeman, and this girl came with her mom. Like, oh, this is so cool.

Is there any way for readers who aren’t in New York to participate?

One thing I’m testing out this year that I’m really excited about is using Facebook Live more, live streaming in order to share the experience. I’m also hoping to spread more chapters throughout the U.S. I’m going to be in LA in April, and I’m planning to host a book club and a few events up there. The same idea for D.C., Chicago and Atlanta. I’m laying the groundwork for it and finding people that are ambassadors. 

How do you choose the books you read?

Initially, it was a little bit of the Oprah’s Book Club mentality. But now I’m fielding requests from different people, especially members of the book club, if they have suggestions around genres we should read. I tend to really love historical fiction and contemporary fiction, but there are so many genres ― mysteries, sci-fi, romance novels ― so I am trying to be more democratic about the process and how I select books. I don’t have a precise way, I just read a book and if I enjoy it, I want to share it.

The two primary things are emerging authors, so people who have debut books. I am looking to build space for authors who may not get a lot of mainstream press and publicity. It’s kind of tied with popularity, what does everyone want to read right now? So everyone was excited about Swing Time. Zadie Smith will not be at the book club tomorrow [laughs], but it was such a popular book last year.

Have you ever considered working classics into the fold, or do you want to focus more on new books?

Well, this month, because it’s Black History Month, I’ve been doing additional events, because not everyone can come to the book club, and I do want us to be a space where everyone can participate. So I did something at the Brooklyn Museum, and we read Audre Lorde’s Sister Outsider. We had a massive turnout. It happened right after the Women’s March, so there were a lot of great conversations about, what were the benefits, and how can we be more mindful of including everyone’s voice when it comes to activism and protest. We used Lorde’s essay, “The Uses of Anger,” as a blueprint, looking at how to approach things when you’re frustrated and angry.

I am looking more at more academic presses, and what they’re publishing, especially post-election. It’s paramount for us to be aware of how to shape our activism. So I had a discussion with Dorothy E. Roberts at Strand last week ― it was the 20th anniversary of her book Killing the Black Body, a much heavier, more academic book. It really tied in well with everything that’s happening right now around reproductive justice. So I am being very conscious about the books and the conversations in the context of our larger political landscape, which originally was not a goal of mine. It was more of a leisurely entertainment space. But like most people, after November I saw a shift in my consciousness and what I wanted to put out publicly.

What are some of the forthcoming titles you’re excited to read?

Let me think. Oh ― oh, I mean: Roxane Gay. Come on. Roxane Gay’s Difficult Women, I’m absolutely obsessed with. I just started it. I just love her work, as an author, an activist, and just being so bold and outspoken. I haven’t had an opportunity to meet her, but just reading from Bad Feminist to Untamed State, her work is incredible. That’s something that’s on our horizon for the book club.

There’s also a book that I’ve talked about a couple of times, but it’s just so beautifully written. It’s called Whatever Happened to Interracial Love? by Kathleen Collins. She actually passed away several years ago, at around age 40. Her daughter found her journals and old writing samples, and pulled it together and made this book on behalf of her mother, and it’s absolutely riveting. Kathleen was also a filmmaker, so her stories are these really tight scenes, and you can visualize everything she’s writing. That’s also a book that we’re planning to read.

There’s a book called The Woman Next Door, by Yewande Omotoso. I just got that book, and it looks really good. The epigraph is this whole statement about walls, and if that is not timely, I don’t know what is.

Both of my parents are Nigerian and I’m first generation, so I have a fondness for Nigerian writers. There’s an author, Ayobami Adebayo, her book is called Stay With Me, and this is her debut book. It’s about the political turbulence in the 1980s in Nigeria. Both of my parents were in this war ― it was our Civil War; Chimamanda Adichie has written about it. Jesmyn Ward is coming out with a new book in September, Sing, Unburied, Sing. She’s amazing ― Salvage the Bones, what? She’s on my dream list of people to meet and interview.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

U.S. Soccer Orders All Players To 'Stand Respectfully' For National Anthem

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

A recent amendment to U.S. Soccer Federation regulations requires all players to “stand respectfully” when the national anthem is played at games.

The change came after Megan Rapinoe, currently a U.S. Women’s National Team member, protested inequality in America by kneeling while the song played before at least three matches last year.

The new regulation ― which passed last month but only became publicized on Saturday, according to The Associated Press ― reads: “All persons representing a Federation national team shall stand respectfully during the playing of national anthems at any event in which the Federation is represented.”

Penalties for violating the new rule remain unclear. Federation president Sunil Gulati told Fox Soccer TV that actions would be decided on a case-by-case basis.

The USWNT had been unaware of the new regulation and would “assess the implications of any unreasonable restrictions for our members,” according to a statement players sent to Sports Illustrated.com

The coach for the women’s team, Jill Ellis, told the AP that she was pleased about the policy.

“I’ve always felt that that should be what we do, to honor the country, have the pride of putting on the national team jersey. I think that should be the expectation,” she said.

 

San Francisco 49ers player Colin Kaepernick started the practice of athletes sitting out or taking a kneeduring the anthem last year. He set out to protest racial inequality amid a growing outcry over the increasing number of black people killed by law enforcement. 

Several NFL players and other professional athletes followed suit, as did some high school athletes, marching bands and at least one coach. 

Rapinoe, who kneeled before three games last year, could not immediately be reached for comment. She said last year that her protests were intended to express solidarity with Kaepernick. Rapinoe, who is gay, said she was also protesting injustices against the LGBTQ community. Kaerpernick has said he plans to stand during the anthem this year. 

U.S. Soccer, which has come under stinging criticism for not paying its female and male players equally, issued a statement condemning Rapinoe’s protest after she joined the USWNT and kneeled before a match against Thailand.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage + articlesList=5823a553e4b0e80b02ceb707,57d0adf9e4b06a74c9f28b00,57dbe76de4b04a1497b3a138,559fc0d5e4b096729155e544

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices