To Protest Trump's Travel Ban, Museum Will Temporarily Remove All Work By Immigrant Artists

Museums around the country have responded in big and small ways to President Donald Trump’s highly contested travel ban, which bars immigrants from seven Muslim-majority nations and indefinitely blocks Syrian refugees from entering the U.S. 

The Davis Museum at Wellesley College in Massachusetts is just the latest.

On Wednesday, the museum announced that it will be de-installing or shrouding all artwork by immigrants, as well as any art given to the museum by immigrants.

The decision to remove the work is meant “to highlight the invaluable contributions that immigrants from all over the world have made on our society and culture,” the museum wrote in a press statement. Echoing the American Association of Museum Director’s statement on Trump’s executive order, the Davis Museum describes the deinstallation ― dubbed “Art-Less” ― as a “protest” that will take place from Thursday, Feb. 16, until Tuesday, Feb. 21.

The Davis Museum will be taking down or hiding 120 works of art in total, including paintings, bronze and wood sculptures and ceremonial masks from European, American, African, contemporary and modern collections. The initiative will amount to a censoring of 20 percent of the objects on view in the Museum’s permanent collections galleries. The impact of “Art-Less” on the African galleries will be particularly stark ― nearly 80 percent of the galleries’ objects were donated by the Klejman family, who immigrated to the U.S. from Poland after World War II.

“Every permanent collections gallery will be affected by the subtraction of works created by or given to the Museum by an immigrant to the United States,” Claire Whitner, assistant director of curatorial affairs and senior curator of collections, explained in the statement.

The museum will note the removal or obfuscation of works with labels that read “made by an immigrant” or “given by an immigrant.” (Work that cannot be removed will also be draped in black cloth.) In fact, the Davis encourages other “sympathetic institutions” to download the labels in an effort to broaden the “Art-Less” initiative

One of the “subtracted” works will be a recognizable portrait of George Washington that was painted by the Swedish-born artist Adolf Ulrik Wertmüller. Wertmüller immigrated to the U.S. in the 1790s. His oil painting was given to the Davis Museum by the Munn family, who also emigrated from Sweden after World War II. 

The decision to remove work from its collection might seem counterproductive to some, but the Davis Museum seems to believe that the temporary absence of art will highlight how reliant art museums are on immigrants artists and benefactors. 

The “Art-Less” protest comes after the Museum of Modern Art’s decision to hang more art by artists from Muslim-majority nations on its walls. MoMA’s Chief Curator of Drawings and Prints Christophe Cherix described the endeavor as a “clear reaction” to Trump’s travel ban that was meant to express “solidarity with artists from different countries.”

The Museum of the City of New York has similarly taken action, staging an exhibition called “Muslim in New York” that pays tribute to the legacy of Muslim life in the city’s five boroughs.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Lawmaker Wants Oregon To Kick All Voters Off Rolls, Force Them To Prove Citizenship

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Oregon residents could consider a ballot measure next year that would require all voters to re-register to vote by 2020 and prove they are U.S. citizens.

The measure would cancel all existing registrations in 2020 unless voters re-register with documents proving they are citizens, such as a passport, birth certificate or certificate of naturalization.

James Buchal, a Portland lawyer who is one of the chief petitioners behind the effort, said in an interview that he wasn’t aware of evidence of widespread voter fraud being an issue in Oregon. He said he had heard evidence of registered voters showing up for jury duty elsewhere and then saying that they were not U.S. citizens to get out of it.

There is no evidence to suggest that widespread voter fraud is a national problem. But state Rep. Mike Nearman (R), another backer of the measure, said that there needs to be more investigation into the matter.

Nearman says the petition has around 2,000 signatures and will need to earn at least 118,000 by next year to get on the ballot. As President Donald Trump continues to stoke fears of voter fraud, the petition provides an example of the kind of measure that could gain momentum.

Critics of the proposal say it would create confusion and make it more difficult for minorities, low-income residents and older voters to vote. In 2006, the Brennan Center for Justice found that as many as 7 percent of voters didn’t have proof of citizenship.

Kate Titus, the executive director of Common Cause Oregon, said she thought it was likely the initiative would make it on to the ballot in 2018.

“The problem with these kinds of bills, which I call voter suppression bills, is they sound like they’re aimed at one thing, but the consequences are to make it more difficult for eligible voters to vote,” she said. “In this case, proof of citizenship is the core theme, so it makes it seem like it’s aimed at excluding non-citizens who are trying to vote, which we currently have no evidence that there’s a problem of that. But the impact that it will definitely have is to call into question the registrations of all currently registered voters in Oregon.”

Titus said that the measure would have a “chilling” effect on voter registration because many people lacked the documentation and time to go through the process of registering to vote all over again.

“For people who have a driver’s license, it’s easy to think, well doesn’t everybody have a driver’s license, or for people who have a passport, doesn’t everyone have a passport, but in fact, many people don’t.”

Last year, a federal appeals court blocked efforts in Kansas, Georgia and Alabama to get voters to show proof of citizenship before voting.

Nearman said he didn’t see why the law would make it more difficult for certain Oregonians to vote.

“I don’t know why a minority would be less likely to go down and re-register. I mean there’s not anything that has to do with skin color or even culture or anything like that that makes it less likely to register to vote,” he said. “If you’re not working, that’s not everybody who’s poor, I get that, but if you’re not working, I’d think you’d have even more time to go down to the county clerk or to the DMV and register to vote.”

Research has found that states that require voters to present an ID have depressed turnout among minority voters.

Buchal noted that the measure provided accommodation for people who didn’t have documentation proving they were citizens. But he suggested that people who couldn’t find the time to go through the process of re-registering didn’t deserve to vote.

“If they don’t care enough to get re-registered, I don’t care enough about their vote,” he said.

Last year, Oregon was the first state in the country to implement automatic voter registration, which automatically registered over 225,000 voters. Oregon election officials have said there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the state.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

The Number Of Anti-Muslim Hate Groups In The U.S. Tripled In 2016

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

The number of anti-Muslim hate groups in the U.S. nearly tripled in 2016 partly because of Donald Trump’s rise to political power, suggests a new report.

There were 34 such groups in the U.S. in 2015 and 101 last year, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Annual Census of Hate Groups published Wednesday. That’s a 197 percent rise and “by the far the most dramatic change” among extremist groups in the U.S.

“Anti-Muslim hate has been expanding rapidly for more than two years now, driven by radical Islamist attacks including the June mass murder of 49 people at an Orlando, Fla., gay nightclub, the unrelenting propaganda of a growing circle of well-paid ideologues, and the incendiary rhetoric of Trump — his threats to ban Muslim immigration, mandate a registry of Muslims in America, and more,” Mark Potok, a senior fellow at SPLC, wrote in the report

The anti-Muslim groups listed in the report consider Islam an inherently evil political ideology ― not a religion ― that uniformly sanctions violence, pedophilia and a host of other crimes. 

Moreover, the groups earnestly believe in conspiracy theories saying Muslims are somehow subversively trying to replace governments in America and Europe with Islamic theocracies bent on implementing a brutal interpretation of Shariah, or Islamic law. 

While many of these groups were once relegated to the fringes of American politics, they now hold real influence in the Trump administration

Almost 50 of the new additions to the SPLC’s list of anti-Muslim hate groups were local chapters of Act for America, an organization whose national founder bragged in a December email of having a “direct line” to the White House. 

Michael Flynn, who resigned as Trump’s national security adviser on Tuesday, was a board member for Act for America. Mike Pompeo, who Trump picked to head up the CIA, also has deep ties to the group: He once sponsored a legislative briefing on Capitol Hill for the group, and accepted Act for America’s National Security Eagle Award for 2016. 

Jeff Sessions, the new attorney general, is closely affiliated with a hate group called the David Horowitz Freedom Center ― he once accepted an award from the organization, and regularly speaks at its events. 

Steve Bannon, Trump’s chief strategist who now sits on the National Security Council, has praised anti-Muslim hate group leaders as experts on Islam ― most notably the paranoid conspiracy theorist Frank Gaffney, who heads the Center for Security Policy.  

And Kellyanne Conway, a White House counselor and frequent Trump spokeswoman, conducted a deeply flawed poll for Gaffney’s organization. It claimed that 20 percent of Muslims in the U.S. think “the use of violence in the United States is justified in order to make Shariah the law of the land in this country.” These results came from an opt-in survey, which the American Association for Public Opinion Research says means the “the pollster has no idea who is responding to the question.” The CSP poll was also packed with loaded and misleading questions.

The influence of anti-Muslim hate groups was readily apparent during Trump’s campaign. He cited Conway’s poll, for example, while calling for a complete shutdown of Muslims entering the country.

Trump also proposed creating a national database of Muslims, and voiced support for surveilling mosques and profiling Muslims. He frequently told an apocryphal story about shooting Muslims with bullets dipped in pig blood, and once suggested that the Muslim mother of a fallen American soldier wasn’t allowed to talk. He also once declared, “Islam hates us.”

There’s a financial explanation for this kind of anti-Muslim hate in national politics, Potok said. 

“The anti-Muslim groups are the best-funded of radical right-wing groups in this country,” he told reporters in a conference call Wednesday. The groups have received millions of dollars in funding in recent years to peddle fear and misinformation about Islam and Muslims. 

Potok said David Horowitz, of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, earned $567,000 in 2014. Gaffney, of the Center for Security Policy, earned $200,000 in 2011, according to a report from Georgetown University. 

“Hating Muslims pays well,” Potok said. 

The SPLC-listed groups generally dispute the label of “hate group.” Gaffney told The Huffington Post last year that the SPLC is “essentially acting as an agent of the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamic supremacists” in labeling groups like his as hateful. 

Outside the world of professional, suit-and-tie Islamophobia, according to the SPLC report, American militia “Patriot” groups, such as III% Security Force, became increasingly anti-Muslim in nature in 2016.

Most notably, three Trump-supporting militia members were arrested in Kansas in October for plotting to bomb an apartment complex in order to kill some 120 Muslim immigrants from Somalia who lived there. 

And as the number of anti-Muslim hate groups has grown, so has the number of anti-Muslim hate crimes. There was a 67 percent rise in hate crimes targeting Muslims in 2015, according to the FBI, which hasn’t released its hate crime numbers for 2016. 

HuffPost tracked nearly 400 incidents of anti-Muslim violence, vandalism, policy and political speech in 2016; we also identified at least 13 times Trump supporters attacked, threatened or plotted to kill American Muslims. 

According to Potok, the way our nation’s political leaders talk about Muslims greatly influences anti-Muslim hate. 

Although there was a steep rise in anti-Muslim hate crimes in the three months after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, the number of hate crimes dropped dramatically in 2002. This, Potok said, happened largely due to then-President George W. Bush repeatedly saying that “Arabs and Muslims aren’t our enemy … our enemy is a very specific group called al Qaeda.” 

Compare that to the 1,094 hate incidents targeting all minority groups that the SPLC says it documented in the 34 days after Trump’s election victory. Over 300 of those incidents targeted Muslims and immigrants, and more than one-third of the perpetrators directly “referenced either Trump, his ‘Make America Great Again’ slogan, or his infamous remarks about grabbing women by the genitals.” 

The SPLC report found the overall number of hate groups operating in 2016 rose to 917 ― up from 892 in 2015. That’s a high number by historic standards, the SPLC said, although not as high as the 1,018 hate groups it identified in 2011. 

In addition to anti-Muslim groups, the SPLC also identified groups that were white nationalist, affiliated with the KKK, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBT, black separatist and anti-Semitic.

Trump’s election, Potok said, “has been absolutely electrifying to the radical right.”

Potok added, however, that the SPLC report likely understates “the real state of the radical right in the U.S.” 

Because although many people are members of “brick-and-mortar hate groups on the ground,” there are many more who aren’t affiliated with formal groups, instead “lurking on the internet until the day they decide that action is needed.” 

Such was the case with Dylann Roof, a white supremacist who killed nine black churchgoers in Charleston, South Carolina, in 2015. Potok said Roof “decided based solely on what he was reading on the internet” that “black people needed to die.” 

“We think there are a lot of Dylann Roofs out there,” Potok said. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Couples Get Candid About Their First And Last Time Having Sex

You never forget your first time having sex with your spouse or significant other ― though depending on how awkward it was, you may wish you could. 

In the WatchCut video above, long-time couples are asked to describe their first time getting busy in as much detail as possible. 

“It was on a love seat in my living room,” one woman recalls of her first time with her girlfriend. “There was somebody sleeping relatively right next to us and somebody in the bedroom and then some other people had passed out, in the hallway-dining room area.”  

Ah, young love. 

When asked about the most recent time they had sex, every single one of the couples had to push themselves to remember.

“That’s by appointment nowadays,” one wife and mom of two young kids jokes. 

Watch the video above for more.

The HuffPost Lifestyle newsletter will make you happier and healthier, one email at a time. Sign up here.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Stories + articlesList=5871b373e4b08052400ee35e,57c5b96ee4b09cd22d92d358,56310807e4b00aa54a4c410c,586ee1afe4b099cdb0fc7827

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

African-American GIs of WWII: Fighting for democracy abroad and at home

By Maria Höhn, Vassar College

Until the last decade, the contributions of African-American soldiers in World War II barely registered in America’s collective memory of that war.

The “tan soldiers,” as the black press affectionately called them, were also for the most part left out of the triumphant narrative of America’s “Greatest Generation.” In order to tell their story of helping defeat Nazi Germany in my 2010 book, “Breath of Freedom,” I had to conduct research in more than 40 different archives in the U.S. and Germany.

When a German TV production company, together with Smithsonian TV, turned that book into a documentary, the filmmakers searched U.S. media and military archives for two years for footage of black GIs in the final push into Germany and during the occupation of post-war Germany.

They watched hundreds of hours of film and discovered less than 10 minutes of footage. This despite the fact that among the 16 million U.S. soldiers who fought in World War II, there were about one million African-American soldiers.

They fought in the Pacific, and they were part of the victorious army that liberated Europe from Nazi rule. Black soldiers were also part of the U.S. Army of occupation in Germany after the war. Still serving in strictly segregated units, they were sent to democratize the Germans and expunge all forms of racism.


A soldier paints over a swastika.
NARA

It was that experience that convinced many of these veterans to continue their struggle for equality when they returned home to the U.S. They were to become the foot soldiers of the civil rights movement – a movement that changed the face of our nation and inspired millions of repressed people across the globe.

As a scholar of German history and of the more than 70-year U.S. military presence in Germany, I have marveled at the men and women of that generation. They were willing to fight for democracy abroad, while being denied democratic rights at home in the U.S. Because of their belief in America’s “democratic promise” and their sacrifices on behalf of those ideals, I was born into a free and democratic West Germany, just 10 years after that horrific war.

Fighting racism at home and abroad

By deploying troops abroad as warriors for and emissaries of American democracy, the military literally exported the African-American freedom struggle.

Beginning in 1933, when Adolf Hitler came to power, African-American activists and the black press used white America’s condemnation of Nazi racism to expose and indict the abuses of Jim Crow at home. America’s entry into the war and the struggle against Nazi Germany allowed civil rights activists to significantly step up their rhetoric.

Langston Hughes’ 1943 poem, “From Beaumont to Detroit,” addressed to America, eloquently expressed that sentiment:

“You jim crowed me / Before hitler rose to power- / And you are still jim crowing me- / Right now this very hour.”

Believing that fighting for American democracy abroad would finally grant African-Americans full citizenship at home, civil rights activists put pressure on the U.S. government to allow African-American soldiers to “fight like men,” side by side with white troops.

The military brass, disproportionately dominated by white Southern officers, refused. They argued that such a step would undermine military efficiency and negatively impact the morale of white soldiers. In an integrated military, black officers or NCOs might also end up commanding white troops. Such a challenge to the Jim Crow racial order based on white supremacy was seen as unacceptable.

The manpower of black soldiers was needed in order to win the war, but the military brass got its way; America’s Jim Crow order was to be upheld. African-Americans were allowed to train as pilots in the segregated Tuskeegee Airmen. The 92nd Buffalo Soldiers and 93rd Blue Helmets all-black divisions were activated and sent abroad under the command of white officers.

Despite these concessions, 90 percent of black troops were forced to serve in labor and supply units, rather than the more prestigious combat units. Except for a few short weeks during the Battle of the Bulge in the winter of 1944 when commanders were desperate for manpower, all U.S. soldiers served in strictly segregated units. Even the blood banks were segregated.

‘A Breath of Freedom’

After the defeat of the Nazi regime, an Army manual instructed U.S. occupation soldiers that America was the “living denial of Hitler’s absurd theories of a superior race,” and that it was up to them to teach the Germans “that the whole concept of superiority and intolerance of others is evil.” There was an obvious, deep gulf between this soaring rhetoric of democracy and racial harmony, and the stark reality of the Jim Crow army of occupation. It was also not lost on the black soldiers.


Women’s Army Corps in Nuremberg, Germany, 1949.
Library of Congress

Post-Nazi Germany was hardly a country free of racism. But for the black soldiers, it was their first experience of a society without a formal Jim Crow color line. Their uniform identified them as victorious warriors and as Americans, rather than “Negroes.”

Serving in labor and supply units, they had access to all the goods and provisions starving Germans living in the ruins of their country yearned for. African-American cultural expressions such as jazz, defamed and banned by the Nazis, were another reason so many Germans were drawn to their black liberators. White America was stunned to see how much black GIs enjoyed their time abroad, and how much they dreaded their return home to the U.S.

By 1947, when the Cold War was heating up, the reality of the segregated Jim Crow Army in Germany was becoming a major embarrassment for the U.S. government. The Soviet Union and East German communist propaganda relentlessly attacked the U.S. and challenged its claim to be the leader of the “free world.” Again and again, they would point to the segregated military in West Germany, and to Jim Crow segregation in the U.S. to make their case.

Coming ‘home’

Newly returned veterans, civil rights advocates and the black press took advantage of that Cold War constellation. They evoked America’s mission of democracy in Germany to push for change at home. Responding to that pressure, the first institution of the U.S. to integrate was the U.S. military, made possible by Truman’s 1948 Executive Order 9981. That monumental step, in turn, paved the way for the 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education.


Hosea Williams, World War II Army veteran and civil rights activist, rallies demonstrators in Selma, Ala. 1965.
AP Photo

The veterans who had been abroad electrified and energized the larger struggle to make America live up to its promise of democracy and justice. They joined the NAACP in record numbers and founded new chapters of that organization in the South, despite a wave of violence against returning veterans. The veterans of World War II and the Korean War became the foot soldiers of the civil rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s. Medgar Evers, Amzie Moore, Hosea Williams and Aaron Henry are some of the better-known names, but countless others helped advance the struggle.

About one-third of the leaders in the civil rights movement were veterans of World War II.

They fought for a better America in the streets of the South, at their workplaces in the North, as leaders in the NAACP, as plaintiffs before the Supreme Court and also within the U.S. military to make it a more inclusive institution. They were also the men of the hour at the 1963 March on Washington, when their military training and expertise was crucial to ensure that the day would not be marred by agitators opposed to civil rights.

“We structured the March on Washington like an army formation,” recalled veteran Joe Hairston.

For these veterans, the 2009 and 2013 inaugurations of President Barack Obama were triumphant moments in their long struggle for a better America and a more just world. Many never thought they would live to see the day that an African-American would lead their country.

To learn more about the contributions of African-American GIs, visit “The Civil Rights Struggle, African-American GIs, and Germany” digital archive.

The ConversationMaria Höhn, Professor and Chair of History, Vassar College

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Adele Says Beyoncé Should Have Won Album Of The Year, Not Her

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Adele’s “25” was named Album of the Year at the 59th annual Grammy Awards on Sunday. But when she took the stage to accept the award, the visibly emotional singer told the audience that she shouldn’t have won. 

“I can’t possibly accept this award, and I’m very humbled and I’m very grateful and gracious, but my artist of my life is Beyoncé and this album, to me, the ‘Lemonade’ album, was so monumental Beyoncé,” Adele said of Beyoncé’s 2016 album, which was nominated in the same category as “25.” “It was so monumental and so well-thought-out and so beautiful and soul-baring, and we all got to see another side to you that you don’t always let us see and we appreciate that.”

“You are our light,” she added. “And the way that you make me and my friends feel, the way you make my black friends feel, is empowering. You make them stand up for themselves and I love you. I always have and I always will.”

The heartfelt speech brought Beyoncé to tears as she sat and listened from the front row.

Adele ended up winning five Grammys on Sunday night, while Beyoncé only took home two awards ― for Best Music Video and Best Urban Contemporary Album. According to Billboard’s Nat Adderley, no black woman has won Album of the Year since Lauryn Hill in 1999.

Adele also praised Beyoncé after “Hello” won Record of the Year minutes earlier, saying, “My idol is Queen Bey, and I adore you and you move my soul every single day and you have done [so] for nearly 17 years. I adore you and I want you to be my mummy.”

Adele’s night actually started off rather awkwardly, when she stopped her tribute to the late George Michael because she felt it wasn’t going well. But it all ended with the world applauding her.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Dry Your Beyoncé Grammy Tears And Listen To Her New Song With Jay Z

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Everyone will process Beyoncé losing Album of the Year to Adele at the Grammys in their own way, but at least we have a new song to help us cope with this award show foolery. 

Immediately following the ceremony, DJ Khaled dropped a new track off his forthcoming album “Grateful” featuring Queen B and Jay Z titled “Shining.” The song is the first official collaboration for the couple since “Drunk in Love” and “Tom Ford” were released in 2013.

Remember, the rapper was famously seen and not heard on Beyoncé’s 2016 album, “Lemonade.” 

Listen to the song below. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Busta Rhymes Slams 'President Agent Orange' And His Muslim Ban At Grammys

Rapper Busta Rhymes did not hold back at the Grammy Awards on Sunday. 

Rhymes joined rap group A Tribe Called Quest and Grammy-nominated artist Anderson .Paak for a politically-charged performance during which Rhymes called out President Donald Trump for his immigration ban. 

“Thank you, President Agent Orange, for all of that evil that you’ve been perpetuating throughout the United States,” Rhymes said. “I want to thank President Agent Orange for your unsuccessful Muslim ban.”

The rappers, who were introduced to the stage by singer Solange, dedicated their performance to the late, great ATCQ group member Phife Dawg. They performed the group’s latest hit single, “We The People,” and were joined by a parade of diverse individuals onstage, including Muslim women wearing hijabs who raised their fists and chanted alongside the rappers as they collectively recited “resist!” 

Watch their epic performance in full below.

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

The Grammys Were Chock-Full Of Messages Of Resistance

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

On this weekend’s episode of “Saturday Night Live,” Cecily Strong, while playing a visibly annoyed judge overseeing a court case involving Donald Trump, joked, “I want one day without a CNN alert that scares the hell out of me, all right? I just want to relax and watch the Grammys.”

But these days, nothing, not even the Grammys, can be completely free of politics. As such, the 59th annual Grammy Awards on Sunday were chock-full of subtle messages of resistance against the Trump administration.

Host James Corden started the night off on a political bent during his opening monologue, when he said, “Live it all up because this is the best and with President Trump we don’t know what comes next.”

But the political messages actually started rolling in before the show started. Schoolboy Q arrived on the red carpet wearing a pink hoodie that read “GIRL POWER.” His daughter, Joy Hanley, was wearing a matching suit. 

Early on in the show, Paris Jackson, while introducing The Weeknd and Daft Punk, said, “We could really used this kind of excitement at a pipeline protest, guys,” a reference to the movement to fight the Dakota Access Pipeline. And before announcing the winner of Best New Artist, Jennifer Lopez quoted Toni Morrison’s message for artists working during politically difficult times:

This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.

Katy Perry wore an armband that read “PERSIST” during her performance and stood in front of a backdrop of the Constitution, yelling “No hate!

While accepting the award for Best Urban Contemporary Album, Beyoncé explained why she believed representation in the arts was so important to young boys and girls, saying, “It’s important for me to show images to my children that reflect their beauty so they can grow up in a world where they look in the mirror ― first through their own families, as well as the news, the Super Bowl, the Olympics, the White House and the Grammys ― and see themselves.”

She then added, “I want that for every child of every race, and I feel it’s vital that we learn from the past and recognize our tendencies to repeat our mistakes.” 

Laverne Cox asked for people to learn more about transgender male Gavin Grimm, whose battle to use the bathroom of the gender with which he identifies will soon reach the Supreme Court

But perhaps the most remarkable political moment of the night came during A Tribe Called Quest’s performance, when Busta Rhymes joined the hip-hop group and quickly started taking shots at the president, repeatedly referring to him as “President Agent Orange.”

“I wanna thank President Agent Orange for perpetuating all the evil that you’ve been perpetuating throughout the United States. I wanna thank President Agent Orange for your unsuccessful attempt at the Muslim ban. Now we come together!” he said. “We the people! We the people! We the people!”

Soon thereafter, Anderson .Paak joined the stage along with multiple women dressed in hijab. The performance then ended with A Tribe Called Quest’s Q-Tip shouting one word repeatedly to the crowd: “Resist, resist, resist.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Bruno Mars And The Time Rock Out To Prince Medley During Grammy Tribute

The Time, a band that Prince built, performed a rousing medley of the Purple One’s songs at Sunday’s Grammy Awards, with a little help from Bruno Mars.

The Time opened with excerpts of “Jungle Love” and “The Bird,” two songs that Prince wrote and produced under the pseudonym Jamie Starr. Mars, dressed in Prince’s iconic plum suit, then joined the band for “Let’s Go Crazy.” 

Mars and The Time’s performance was the latest among many Prince tributes since the singer’s death last April. Madonna did a sweet cover of “Nothing Compares 2 U” at the Billboard Music Awards in May, where she was joined by Stevie Wonder for part of “Purple Rain.” A month later, the BET Awards featured a series of tributes involving Erykah Badu, The Roots, Steve Wonder, Tori Kelly, Jennifer Hudson, Janelle Monáe and others. In October, an all-star concert in Minneapolis included Anita Baker, Chaka Khan and Jessie J. And Bruce Springsteen opened his Brooklyn show with a cover of “Purple Rain.” 

Good night, sweet Prince. Your legacy lives on. 

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices