Charlie Wilson On How He Has Maintained Relevancy In Music For Decades

Charlie Wilson has a proven record of overcoming the odds, and his latest album is a testament to his perseverance. 

The 64-year-old R&B-funk veteran landed on the top of the charts in February with the release of his eighth solo album, “In It To Win It.” Featuring collaborations from the likes of Snoop Dogg, Robin Thicke, Lalah Hathaway, Pitbull and Wiz Khalifa, the project debuted at No. 1 on the R&B Album chart, No. 7 on the Billboard 200 and No. 2 on the Billboard Top Album Sales chart. Adding to Wilson’s list of current achievements, the album’s lead single, “I’m Blessed,” featuring T.I., is currently this year’s fastest-growing single on the Billboard Adult R&B chart.

Wilson, who is also a New York Times best-selling author, is headlining a 30-city “In It To Win It Tour” with special guests Fantasia and Johnny Gill.

The former Gap Band member spoke to The Huffington Post about recording “In It To Win It,” and shared some of his secrets to maintaining relevancy for decades and his thoughts on Bruno Mars recapturing the essence of funk music.

Congratulations on the success of your new album, “In It To Win It.” How does it feel to land chart-topping success at this stage in your career?

It’s what I’ve always wanted. I wanted to make sure that I had a record that would make a statement. I’m excited to have the look of the pop thing going with it. I think that anything that I have on my album has that appeal, and I hope that everybody can look at this record and understand that it’s a special piece. This is a time where people are digitally downloading the one song, and for me to have an album of great records and features, it’s just so beautiful and so fresh, and I’m going for the whole thing. I think it speaks in volumes, what I’m doing. So I’m happy.

How important was it for you to tap a new circle of collaborators, who typically would fall outside of your core adult contemporary demographic? 

I think my fans need to go along with where I’m going. If they gonna connect with me and stay with me, then I need to take them along for this journey that I’m on. I’ve been tapping lightly for so many years, trying to stay loyal to the close fans. But I also have fans that are so very, very young.  And so, I have fans from 10 to 20 and they always tell me, “Uncle Charlie, [the only song we know] is ‘Charlie, Last Name Wilson.’” And I was like, OK, so I need to continue to reach out and make records that all of my fans can understand and love and appreciate.

So I just thought that I would get some of these artists that I know would love and appreciate me now, get them on my record and bring their fans along with me on my journey. And my younger fans can appreciate some of the things that I’m doing this time around. And my older fans can just understand that you gotta stay young and fresh. So I have to keep everybody active, and go on this journey and party like a rock star.

On the album’s title track, you talk about your experiences overcoming racism, homelessness and substance abuse. What prompted you to record the track? 

I thought people needed to hear it. There’s a lot of people still doing the same things I did, even when I was a young man. A lot of people that I still know that was getting high with me when I was in my 20s and 30s, they’re still getting high. I’m like, “Are you serious? You haven’t moved on? You’re still sitting on that same front porch?” That’s not good at all. What baton are you passing, and who are you passing it to? Because if that’s all you’re doing then you’re teaching your kids and your grandkids to be an alcoholic and a dope head. And so, I have to continue to give a message of self-hope and next-level hope. 

People always told me that I was too old to get to where I’m at now. They said I wouldn’t ever do this, and I wouldn’t ever do that. It used to hurt me so much to have people tell me that, but until I did not listen to what they were saying and got up to make a difference and do something about it, I didn’t get to where I wanted until I started believing in myself. I started making No. 1 records. And so, I just wanna continue to inspire people and make them understand, no matter what people say about you ― you could be 30, 40, 50, 60 years old ― you could go do whatever you wanna do and be bossin’ at it. But you gotta believe you can do it.  

So many veteran artists often find challenges appealing to today’s generation of listeners. But yet, you’ve managed to net success while staying true to your core sound. What’s your secret to longevity and remaining relevant in music?

I’m a leader, and I’m not copying anybody. You see everybody out here listening to music and just trying to copy that music. I’m not copying any of that. If you listen to some of the biggest records in the world, you’re gonna hear some Charlie Wilson riffs in it. I’m not trying to make a record for another genre, I’m just making great records and I’m staying fresh. I know what’s out there, but I’m not gonna make a record like that. I’m just gonna make sure that my records stay fresh for the time we’re in. And I make timeless records. I always have.   

In recent years, popular artists like Bruno Mars have landed success with funk-driven singles like [Mark Ronson’s] “Uptown Funk” and “24K Magic.” What are your thoughts on the resurgence of funk music coming full circle to popular music?

It’s great. For him to use “Oops Upside Your Head” as a template for [”Uptown Funk”], I thought it was great. If people like myself or the genre that I came from started making funk records, you know what [listeners] gonna say, right? “It sounds dated.” So, hey, man, sometimes it takes other people to make the record to wake up the funk world. And so it’s great, man. I’m happy and I love Bruno Mars. He’s one of the biggest artists we got out there in the pop world and he’s doing it really well.

I’m glad that he’s funking, and he sounds really, really good. I’ve seen him several times and we’ve talked. He understands the stage. And he’s going hard.

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

This Reporter Interviewed THE Adrian Peterson And Totally Failed To Recognize Him

Adrian Peterson is statistically one of the greatest NFL running backs of all time. But this Houston reporter had no idea he was interviewing a legend when he asked Peterson a few questions about road rage.

On Tuesday, Fox 26 reporter John Donnelly approached a regular citizen for a man-on-the-street interview. Peterson kindly answered the reporter’s questions and talked about his past experiences with handling road rage.

As the interview wrapped up, Donnelly asked Peterson, “Your name?”

Peterson naturally replied, “Adrian Peterson.”

“Wait a minute, you’re not…,” Donnelly said.

After an awkward pause, Peterson said, “Yeah.”

The two men then shared a laugh.

Donnelly posted this picture on Facebook after the interview.

Peterson hails from Palestine, Texas, and last year put his home in the area on the market.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Chance The Rapper Isn't Too Happy About His Meeting With Illinois Governor

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Last month, Chance The Rapper requested a meeting with Illinois governor, Bruce Rauner, to discuss a funding bill for Chicago’s Public Schools.

In December, Rauner vetoed a $215 million bill benefiting the city’s school system, claiming Democratic leaders backed out of a deal in favor of a comprehensive pension reform.

On Friday, Chance ― who previously expressed his frustrations with state and city’s dismal education and housing budgets ― had a private 30 minute meeting with Rauner at Chicago’s Thompson Center to help shift the governor’s decision.

But to the rapper’s dismay he was met with “vague answers” from the governor.

“I’m here ‘cause I just want people to do their jobs,” he told The Chicago Tribune after his meeting. “And I did speak with the governor. I asked him about funding CPS with that $215 million that was discussed in May of last year and was vetoed in December over, you know, political arguments and (stuff).”

Despite the outcome, Chance tweeted to his follows:

He also provided a few additional thoughts to reporters:

Rauner went to share with the Chicago Sun-Times his thoughts on the pair using their influence for change moving forward.

“That powerful voice can be a voice for change,” he said. “If we stood together, Chance, I have some power, I have power in some ways, you have great power in other ways. If we stood together, worked together, I think we could get big things done.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Ad Proves That Challenging Sexist Gender Roles Is No Longer Radical

“A gender-equal world is a better world for all.”

That’s the tagline ― and truism ― of Procter & Gamble’s (P&G) new women’s empowerment campaign #WeSeeEqual. The campaign’s mission is to spark conversations around gender equality through a series of advertisements. The first spot was released Thursday and falls in line with some of the company’s past “femvertising” campaigns like Secret’s “Stress Test” ads and Always’ “Like A Girl” campaign

The short clip shows different shots of people living their lives in ways that push back on stereotypical gender roles. Viewers see a young girl doing a science experiment; a man crying while hugging his daughters; a father changing his baby’s diaper; a working mother coming home to her daughter.

After each shot a sentence flashes on screen to remind viewers that gender roles are meaningless: “Science doesn’t care who studies it,” and “Tears don’t care who cry them.”

The last shot shows a woman from one of Secret’s Stress Test ads hyping herself up to ask her boss for a raise. “Equal pay doesn’t care who demands it,” the screen reads. 

According to a P&G press release, the company hopes the spot will create more conversations about equality: “#WeSeeEqual is our way of sharing our vision and challenging those around us to consider their own gender biases ― conscious or unconscious ― and take steps to correct negative or outdated stereotypes that are weighing us down.” 

This Women’s History Month, remember that we have the power to make history every day. Follow along with HuffPost on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram in March using #WeMakeHerstory.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Women Of Twitter Celebrate Their Queerness With Empowering Hashtag

ICYMI: queer women are awesome. 

And on Friday afternoon, a beautiful hashtag reminded the Twitterverse of just that.  

Gay, bisexual and pansexual women tweeted their best selfies with amazing captions accompanied by the hashtag: #IssaGayGirl

So in honor of queer girls everywhere, enjoy our tweet roundup below: 

Follow HuffPost’s Queerly Beloved Facebook page for more wonderful content for queer-identifying women. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Remy Ma, Dressed In Funeral Attire, Shares Why She Dropped 'shETHER'

Rapper Remy Ma made a dramatic appearance on “The Wendy Williams Show” on Friday ― just six days after the release of the “oh, s**t”-inducing Nicki Minaj diss track titled “shETHER.”

After four minutes of allowing Remy to discuss topics not related to the song, Williams finally cut to the point: “Let’s talk about ‘shETHER.’” 

Remy sat alongside “Plato O Plomo” album collaborator and brotherly figure Fat Joe ― who remained diplomatically silent throughout the majority of the “shETHER” discussion ― and gave a thorough explanation of why the diss track had to be done. 

“It was the behind-the-scenes stuff that you people will never know about,” Remy said. 

The rapper, who was pointedly wearing funeral attire, alleged that Minaj made attempts to prevent her from appearing on red carpets and winning awards and dragged her recent album sales. 

“Just anything that I’m doing to make me look less and make her look better. And I have a problem with that,” Remy said. “When you’re trying to stop my bag, when you’re trying to stop me from taking care of my children, now I have a problem with that.”

“Why you worried about lil’ old me over here? I just came home from prison. I don’t want no problems with nobody,” she continued. 

Remy also pointed out that Minaj has a history of gunning for other female musicians, referencing Lil’ Kim, Mariah Carey, Taylor Swift and Miley Cyrus (see: “Miley, what’s good?!”). 

“I feel that it’s weird because she’s been doing this to a lot of females … and no one says anything,” Remy said. 

Less than 24 hours before visiting Wendy’s set, Remy released a second diss track titled “Another One,” which was quickly followed by the trending hashtag #ThatWasTrashRemy. The latest track ― which, thankfully, wasn’t discussed on the show ― made reference to Minaj’s radio silence throughout the “shETHER” ordeal. 

But Remy said she isn’t at all pressed for a response from Onika

After addressing the all-black outfit she wore to the show with,  ― “I came dressed appropriately for the services,” she said ― Remy capped off the interview in classic “I know I’m petty, but so what?” fashion with a not-so-subtle shot at Minaj: “My grandmother told me never to speak ill of the dead.”

Watch the full interview with Remy Ma and Fat Joe on “The Wendy Williams Show” below: 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

This Little Boy Dressed Up As Audra McDonald For A School Project And She Loved It

Nine-year-old Brendan O’Brien loves theater, so when he had to choose an icon to honor for a Black History Month project at school, the decision was a no-brainer. 

Brendan is in the fourth grade at the Condon K-8 School in South Boston. For Black History Month in February, all of the students in his class had to do a research project on an influential black figure, past or present. Each child created a presentation and dressed up as their icon of choice for a “wax museum,” in which they would recite a speech about their person’s history.

When Brendan learned of the assignment, he immediately knew who he wanted to be: Tony winner Audra McDonald.

The 9-year-old chose a 1920s-inspired dress, fishnets, heels and a wig inspired by McDonald’s recent role in Broadway’s “Shuffle Along.”

On Feb. 28, the kids put on their “wax museum” exhibit, which featured historical figures like Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr., sports stars like Jackie Robinson and Michael Jordan, political icons like the Obamas, STEM heroes like Katherine Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan, and Mary Jackson, and of course, a tiny Audra McDonald. 

“Brendan loved that he was able to share with his friends something he is passionate about,” his mom, Nicole, told The Huffington Post. “He told us no one knew who Audra McDonald was. Just as important as her awards and Tony records, Brendan has been inspired by the work she does on behalf of marriage equality and NOH8. He shared that with his classmates.”

Nicole said she loved seeing Brendan’s enthusiasm in sharing his knowledge about McDonald’s life and career. “For a kid like Brendan this kind of project is engaging and makes learning come to life,” she said. “He had quite a crowd.” 

Even Audra McDonald herself loved Brendan’s project. Nicole tweeted a photo of him in his costume, which she retweeted. “I am honored!!!!!” the Broadway star wrote.  

Brendan fell in love with theater when he saw his first show at Boston Children’s Theatre at the age of 4. “He told us that day that he wanted to be on stage,” Nicole said. The little boy attends the summer camp at BCT, has appeared in some of its productions throughout the year and performed with other theater programs as well. 

Last year, Brendan’s friends were able to see him perform in a show and do what he loves, which was an exciting experience for everyone.

“His dream is to perform on Broadway,” Nicole said. “He spends hours learning about shows, actors and actresses and performing at home.”

Brendan “screamed with excitement” when he sawMcDonald’s tweet about his project. “For him that kindness and acknowledgment meant the world,” said Nicole. He also received an autographed photo of the actress from her assistant.

The day of the wax museum was particularly fun for Brendan because he got to wear his costume all day, though he removed the heels during recess. He also loved how much interest his friends showed toward his project.

This sort of experience is typical for Brendan, Nicole explained, noting that his large public school is a place where her son feels loved and supported.

“We love that he has always felt comfortable being who he is in his school,” Nicole said. “He brings a pink lunch box, sits with the girls and likes to braid their hair. For Halloween this year he dressed up as Marilyn Monroe!”

She added, “His school is a wonderfully inclusive place where every child is celebrated. He is authentically himself and is loved for that.”

The O’Briens hope all kids can have that kind of experience some day. Nicole said they’re “thankful every day” for the Condon K-8 School, its administration, faculty and the other families.

Nicole hopes Brendan’s interaction with Audra McDonald reminds others that there are good people in the world

“Small acts of kindness go a long way to supporting and encouraging kids like Brendan who want to be like them when they grow up,” she said. “And having a school and a community that is supportive of all kids is so important.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

This Nigerian Family Is The Best Thing To Ever Happen To 'Family Feud'

A Nigerian family is going viral for being delightfully extra on an episode of Steve Harvey’s “Family Feud.”

Five siblings of the Obu family charmed Harvey and the audience alike during their pre-game introduction where they share some hilarious banter with Harvey. The best part is when Harvey loses it after asking one of the Obu children about his unique name:

“Your name is Obu? And your last name is Obu?” Harvey asks. “What is your middle name, Obu?”

“It’s Obu.” 

The episode seems to have originally aired in October 2016 according to a Facebook post by the Obu’s opponents, the Jacksons. But their hilarious appearance has now gone viral after resurfacing on the “Family Feud” YouTube  on Feb. 22. 

Watch the video above and try not to smile. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

We Need An Independent, Non-Partisan Commission To Investigate Trump And Russia Ties

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that he would recuse himself from Trump Campaign-related investigations. However, his recusal should not be limited to only investigations involving the Trump Campaign. Under 28 CFR § 45.2, the Attorney General is required to recuse himself from a criminal investigation when he has a “personal or political relationship with any person or organization substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution,” and must also recuse himself from any investigation where his participation would “create an appearance of a conflict of interest likely to affect the public perception of the integrity of the investigation or prosecution.”

Serious allegations of misconduct involving President Trump and his associates occurred subsequent to the presidential election ― including but not limited to communications between General Flynn and the Russian government, potentially improper contact between White House aides and officials within the Justice Department, and misstatements by the Attorney General himself.

Just as importantly, we need to ensure that any investigation involving issues which overlap between the campaign and the Administration are fully and fairly investigated, including what influence the Russian government, Russian intelligence and Russian financial interests may have with regard to Mr. Trump and his Administration, and whether there have been any efforts to cover up the same.

As such, the Attorney General must recuse himself from any and all investigations involving the campaign, the transition, and the Trump Administration. He must obviously step aside from any investigation in which he himself may be a target.

I am not persuaded by the Attorney General’s effort to explain his misstatements to the Senate Judiciary Committee, in response to questions asked verbally by Senator Franken and in writing by Senator Leahy, and it is not at all clear that an after-the-fact clarification to the Committee will resolve this matter. As every Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee wrote, the question of whether or not the Attorney General’s statement constitutes perjury should be reviewed by the FBI and the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

I am troubled by President Trump’s statement that he does not think Attorney General Sessions should recuse himself from any Russia-related investigations. It was wholly inappropriate for the President to discourage the Attorney General or anyone else from recusing themselves from any ongoing criminal investigation―let alone an investigation in which he and members of his Administration are potential suspects. Such statements fly in the face of applicable DOJ guidelines. They also smack of an attempted cover-up.

These events and statements also make abundantly clear, as I and many other Members of Congress have stated previously, that we need an independent, non-partisan commission to review the entire matter.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=58b863d9e4b0894089be67b5,58b86acae4b0981e2a574754

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices

Should We Tell Immigrants To Go Back Into Hiding?

Earlier this week, Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Jackson, Mississippi, arrested and detained Daniela Vargas, an undocumented immigrant, after she spoke out about immigration issues at a conference.

Vargas was issued DACA, a two year renewable protection from deportation, that had lapsed, and because she entered the country on a visa waiver program, immigration officials are now stating that she has no right to a hearing before a judge. Vargas can be put on the next plane to Argentina.

This news has sent shockwaves through immigrant communities. Non-citizens with DACA no longer feel safe, let alone those who have no protection from deportation. Advocates are urging people with DACA to not let it lapse, and to not speak out publicly about their immigration statuses. However, putting the onus on those who have taken great risks to protect themselves, hardly seems like an adequate answer to the Trump Administration’s continued assault on immigrant rights. Instead, we need to continue to organize, litigate and expose the injustices inherent in this system.

This is not the first time that ICE has tried to deport a DACA-eligible person under a pretext, and it will not be the last. The U.S. government has long used immigration as a way to target political activists starting from Emma Goldman to Marcus Garvey to Tam Tran and now, Daniela Vargas.

The fact that Vargas can be removed without trial, is probably not applicable to most people with DACA, and stems from the fact that she came here under the visa waiver program. Under the Visa Waiver Program, certain non-citizens are permitted to enter the United States as tourists for 90 days or less if they, among other things, waive any right “to contest, other than on the basis of an application for asylum, any action for removal of the alien.” But does that apply to minors and children who were brought here by their parents and grew up to become adults who knowingly or unknowingly overstayed their admittance?

Imagine the case of Vargas, a minor who is brought over at the age of seven to the United States. She probably doesn’t speak or understand English at this time. She is made to sign a “visa waiver” form at the port of entry, waiving her right to a hearing in immigration court. The minor grows up in the U.S., overstaying the 90 days, through no real fault of her own, or anyone else. When she is 22, she gets stopped and detained by ICE for being politically visible under the pretext that her DACA has lapsed, and hence she has no protection from deportation. Does she have any right to a trial instead of expedited removal? After all, how can a minor waive her rights?

The courts are clear that any waiver of rights by a citizen or non-citizen must be voluntary. See Nose v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 993 F.2d 75, 78-79 (5th Cir. 1993); Bayo v. Chertoff, 535 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 2008).

In Galuzzo v. Holder the Second Circuit Court cited Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464, stating with emphasis that, “We indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver of fundamental constitutional rights.” Galuzzo, an Italian national, argued that he had not waived his right to a pre-removal hearing just because he entered on a visa-waiver program and moreover, the government failed to produce a signed waiver from him.

The court ruled that absent a signed waiver, Galuzzo had a due process right to a pre-removal hearing. However, the court did not provide relief to Galuzzo and remanded the case to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to determine whether Galuzzo was prejudiced by a denial of his due process right to a pre-removal hearing.

Additionally, in Mokarram v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 316 F. App’x 949 (11th Cir. 2009), the Eleventh Circuit ruled that an immigrant’s due process rights were violated when he was removed without a hearing under the visa waiver program and that this warranted remand to permit administrative determination as to whether he was substantially prejudiced against by such violation.

The hurdle is whether the non-citizen was substantially prejudiced against by being denied a right to a pre-removal hearing. If a non-citizen has claims such as asylum or cancellation of removal, then she is more likely to be substantially prejudiced against. If there is pending legislation in her favor or she can adjust her status within the next few years through employment or family-based immigration, she can also make the argument that court proceedings would give her the time necessary for adjustment of status, a much better scenario than expedited removal in violation of due process to a country that she neither knows nor remembers.

While the legal system has many drawbacks, advocates should ferociously fight any assertion that their clients have given up basic due process rights to a pre-removal hearing in immigration court. As the case law suggests, it may be unconstitutional to deny someone those rights, especially if they were purportedly waived by an individual as a minor.

Undocumented youth and our parents have taken many risks and shown immense political courage over the past decade to come out of the shadows, and organized to protect themselves and their communities. This is not the time to tell immigrants to go back into the closet, but to join forces and show the Trump Administration that the risk immigrants took was not in vain. That’s what Emma Goldman, Marcus Garvey, Tam Tran and other change-makers targeted by pretextual deportations would have wanted from us.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Source: HuffPost Black Voices